On Monday, less than 24 hours before Michigan Democrats went to the polls, CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten told viewers that Abdul El-Sayed was poised to "deliver the biggest blow yet" to the party establishment. His main piece of evidence for the pronouncement was odds from Kalshi, the prediction market, which gave El-Sayed a 98% chance of winning the nomination, “way up like a rocket" from April.
Enten and “CNN News Central” co-anchor Sara Sidner went on to discuss how disruptive a blowout victory would be for Democrats. It would add to the narrative, Enten said, that the party would need “major changes.”
El-Sayed did end up defeating Haley Stevens—by a single percentage point and 15,000 votes, per unofficial results. But the end result was a much different picture than what many reporters and pundits painted going into Tuesday night.
It wasn’t unreasonable for Enten to cite those numbers. Kalshi did not invent those odds out of thin air, even if Enten’s use of them was notable given CNN’s official partnership with the prediction market. (A spokesperson noted that prediction markets “offer just one source of data that journalists can use in telling a story.”) But the Michigan race…
The rest of this story is for paid subscribers only.
Already a subscriber? Sign in.
Scoop-driven reporting and sharp-edged analysis. See why The Wall Street Journal declared Status a “must-read.”
